News RSS Feed


Grogan faces eco-town pressure

9:09am Thursday 5th June 2008

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »

By Haydn Lewis »

SELBY MP John Grogan is under pressure from campaigners to help settle a row over where to build a planned eco-town.

Selby District councillors, John and Mary McCartney want MP John Grogan to lobby the Government after consultants named Gascoigne Wood mine as their preferred site for a possible eco-town near Selby.

A report by consultants GVA Grimley rules out another three sites earmarked for the "environmentally-friendly" new town at Burn Airfield, Church Fenton, and a site dubbed Willow Green, near Kellington, Eggborough and Beal.

Coun John McCarthy, who is leading the campaign against the proposed Willow Green eco-town, now wants Mr Grogan to ask GMI, the Willow Green developers, to withdraw its bid.

Coun McCarthy said that until, either the Government announces it has rejected a site at Willow Green or GMI formally withdraws its bid, the matter will not be settled.

He said: "Our member of parliament, John Grogan, has said that if the consultants came up with a site that was not Willow Green, then he would call upon GMI to withdraw its bid.

"It is time he backed his constituents in Beal Eggborough and Kellington."

The leaders of the various councils that make up the Leeds City Region will meet on June 12, in Harrogate, to discuss the report and to decide if they will put the Gascoigne Wood site forward to the Government.

Coun McCartney said he wants constituents to contact Mr Grogan at the House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA or email him at GroganJ@parliament.uk Selby's MP, John Grogan, is on record as welcoming an eco-town for the Selby area.

Last week, The Press reported the leader of Selby District Council, Mark Crane, issued a stark warning that Selby "would die" if the eco-town went ahead.

Coun Crane was speaking at a packed village meeting at Burn Gliding Club, which would be demolished to make way for a new town of at least 5,000 homes.

Coun Crane has said he will ask fellow council leaders to oppose all sites when the city region leaders meet next week.

Your Say YourPress

john, selby says...
9:58am Thu 5 Jun 08

In my opinion Grogan has sold the people of Selby district down the river.He should say sorry.

Confused, York says...
1:50pm Thu 5 Jun 08

Who is going to build these houses seeing that house builders are laying off hundreds of workers?
And who is going to buy these houses given that they will be too expensive for first time buyers (Probably) and nobody else can sell their houses due to the current housing market collapse?
It's all pie in the sky if you ask me.

Adrian Clayton, Nunnery Lane says...
7:41pm Thu 5 Jun 08

More building work is good for builders' jobs - that's a plus point.

The question is: exactly what will be new (i.e. eco) about ecotowns?

They can only work (create viable communities) if there is a good reason for them to exist in the location where they're put. Real towns grew up where there were resources, industries, markets - NOT just where there was an old airfield going spare.

I don't see the evidence that long-lasting jobs will be created in Selby area (how many have been created in Selby since the pits shut...?).

I'm not partisan, but the map shows that Gascoigne Wood is a lot nearer sea level than Kellington, which is on a rise. Doesn't seem wise to make people move there for the long term:) Also, Kellington is near M62/Ferrybridge. Is Gascoigne wood going cheap, perhaps?

JBM, Kellington says...
7:38am Fri 6 Jun 08

Kellingon is not 'on a rise' We lie on the floodplain of the River Aire.In 2000 we were evacuated twice because the village was threatened by floodwater. Neither of these two sites are capable of becoming a sustainabe eco-town. Both would become commuter towns full of people driving to work in Leeds, York etc.



mivvi, near York says...
1:46am Sat 7 Jun 08

Adrian has it spot on. Anyone who has studied Urban Geography will understand that, in the past, communities developed in a specific location for various reasons : Employment (farming or industry), raw materials, transport links, route confluence, river crossing, shelter, defence etc. Government directive is not one of them! The only factors in favour of these sites are that they are available for development and close to major roads. Which suggests that the inhabitants will be expected to either commute if they work (fuel cost & carbon footprint?), or vegetate if they don't(no traditional vilage activity). Dormitory towns, as these will be, cannot succesfully be created from nothing on a whim. They are a modern equivalent of the old terraced mining villages but without any common denominator to bind the community and give them a heart. Who would want to live in them?

DaddyLouLou, A19 says...
10:17am Tue 10 Jun 08

IF this gets built, how long before the residents, despite knowing it's next to an airfield before they move in, start complaining that the 'planes are noisy and that the airfield should be closed?

Your sayYourPress

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE York Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs

Your Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts